For those who managed to get through childhood without hearing about Dr. James Dobson and Focus on the Family, the world was probably a prettier, safer place. Brian MacQuarrie profiles Dobson-- and his increasingly powerful evangelic machine-- for the Boston Globe. MacQuarrie conveys Dobson's perspective on abortion, gay rights, and all the despicable human actions currently taking place in his world:
In his view, Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion, has caused the ''biggest holocaust in world history"; the Supreme Court is guilty of ''judicial tyranny" that threatens religious liberties; wide approval for gay marriage would send the nation ''hurtling toward Gomorrah"; and the federal judiciary is a despotic oligarchy that represents ''the last playground of the liberal left."
Millions of people who have turned to Dobson for family advice apparently are willing to accept his political counsel as well. The share of white evangelical Protestants who voted for Bush increased to 78 percent in 2004, a sharp increase from 68 percent in 2000. Dobson is credited by many observers as playing a critical role in their mobilization.
''I'm going to promote the values I think are best for our country, and of course I hope that laws that reflect them are enacted," said Dobson, who rarely grants in-person interviews. ''Isn't that how a democracy operates?"
To Dobson, Focus on the Family is a God-ordained ministry. To his critics, including the Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Dobson is a dangerous demagogue.
''He smiles, he's articulate, he has some quality advice about child rearing," said Lynn, a minister in the United Church of Christ, whose leaders have endorsed gay marriage. ''But on some of these big political questions, he's extremely far to the right, and people ought to recognize that before they start walking down the road with him."
In one lightning-rod example, Dobson used a radio broadcast in August to compare the ethics of embryonic stem-cell research to Nazi medical experiments on prisoners.
''There is no question that the beliefs of conservative Christians are under attack," Dobson told the Globe. ''Any conviction founded on religious faith is vilified; any stand on absolute truth is denigrated as old-fashioned at best, or reminiscent of the Taliban at worst; any view out of lockstep with the left's agenda is met with anything but tolerance and acceptance."
Dobson's ultra-conservative views are not the problem; a marketplace of ideas will reveal some people's preferences for less stringent religious sects. And his practice of registering people to vote for candidates that reflect his religious/ideological views only mirrors the practices of Rock the Vote and Planned Parenthood.
The real problem with Dobson is his narcissism, steeped in self-righteousness. For example, the Focus on the Family website provides a daily update on Dobson's health for the faithful flocks preparing to bomb an abortion clinic on the day when Dobson ascends to heaven.
Dobson's followers are not just conservative Christians-- they are Dobsonites, Dobson defenders, footsoldiers in the movement to purify the world of sin. Dobson and his crew refuse that most Christian virtue otherwise known as "understanding" to gays, choosing instead to describe men who have returned to their straight lives as those who have "left homosexual involvement" rather than those who either experimented with their sexuality or reidentified their sexual selves. His book, Portraits of Freedom, offers "sexual healing" of the sort that makes heresy out of homosexuality. All choices must be made in ways that reflect his religious proclivities. No conscience is correct if it does not buy into his view of Christianity.
Dobson's opinions are elevated to Biblical truths and science. Rather than admit "I think Jesus thinks living in sin is just terrible", Dobson plays the scientist, claiming that "Living together without the benefit of a marriage license can be hazardous to your health". Does this have anything to do with the physical aspect of the marriage license itself (i.e. should you keep it by the bed or in the family room)? Does marriage decrease the likelihood of getting cancer? Have we tested this against the large number of co-habiting European couples?
And Dobson also knows what is best for your baby. In a thoughtful little advice column for women who get pregnant without a marriage license, he writes:
It is difficult to get an accurate picture of adoption with all the trends and ideas in our society about single motherhood. In particular, when magazines and TV shows glamorize the growing numbers of actresses and other female entertainers having babies outside of marriage, it’s tempting to get the idea that single motherhood is just another acceptable “option” for life and parenthood.
Of course, the media fails to mention that raising a baby on a celebrity’s income is an entirely different situation from the poverty-level existence that most single mothers and their babies experience. Nor do you hear much of anything about how these “Hollywood babies” are turning out without fathers in the home ... and the statistics about the effects of fatherlessness on children are anything but glamorous.
Keep in mind who’s most important here. The one truly helpless, innocent person in this situation is your baby. Your child needs you to act responsibly and unselfishly in this situation — which means not rushing into a quick decision based on current emotions, loneliness and sentimentality. The truth is that single mothers often wish they had chosen adoption after only a few months of caring for their child. Therefore, you’ll want to gather information on adoption vs. single motherhood and get input from people you respect (preferably, people who are already parents).
Before you make a decision, you owe it to your baby — and yourself! — to get all the facts about adoption.
Dobson's empire is one where you can count on the following:
It is also an empire that my conscience would never allow me to condone or support. Let's just say I reject James Dobson because he is immoral.